Harmonic study: When two do the same, it is not the same

In this post we look at how various factors and considerations affect the results of network harmonic analysis. After reading this post, it shall not surprise that when two do the same, in this context perform a harmonic analysis, their results may be quite different.

When two do the same…

Imagine following situation:

Multiple variable frequency drives (VFD) shall be installed in a newly built plant or as an extension of an existing plant. The VFD models are already defined and so is the power rating of each motor drive. Two companies are hired to perform a network harmonic analysis. Their results are quite different. Some people may ask: Which of the two studies is correct? Well, this is not a black & white question and answer.

Network harmonic study

Unlike a simple harmonic calculation, a network harmonic study is more detailed and more complex assessment of harmonics (see post Harmonic calculation versus network harmonic study). As a minimum, it models the grid of the plant where the non-linear loads, in our case mainly VFDs, are installed. The upstream grid may be modelled in a simplified way (in basic case as a linear grid defined by short-circuit impedance). One reason for simplification is often the lack of more accurate data. Other reason may be the limited scope of network modelling.

Nevertheless, even in a relative small network model, certain assumptions are usually made. They need to be made as not all information is typically available. An experienced engineer will make “qualified estimates” where exact inputs are missing. Ideally, it is someone with good network modelling skills combined with practical experience (ideally person performing harmonic measurements on site).

What factors make the difference

It is a realistic assumption that not every piece of information is available and some assumptions need to be made. Let’s look at some examples:

  • Let’s start with the VFD: What spectrum is used? Idealized one (e.g. showing only characteristic harmonics) or realistic spectrum considering some residual harmonics of a 6-pulse bridge even when using a multi-pulse rectifier?
  • Grid transformers are mostly defined with rated power, voltage ratio, vector group and short-circuit impedance. The no-load and load losses are often not indicated. However, the network model requires such information to calculate e.g. the winding resistance and thus the damping. A conservative approach considers rather lower transformer losses. Too low losses lead to unrealistically low damping in the system.
  • Power cables contribute with their capacitance to a parallel resonance. The specific capacitance (e.g. μF/km) is provided in the technical datasheet. However, note that the value is subject to tolerance that can easily be ±10% or more.
  • Frequency dependent impedance and skin effect: It is well-known that the resistance increases at higher frequencies due to skin effect. Thus, there is much more damping that helps to limit the distortion, particularly in case of a resonance. Not every network software allows the modelling of skin effect and even if it does, it is up to the user to select the factor. The results are highly sensitive to the factor representing skin effect.
  • Information about other consumers (loads):  Other loads connected to the same grid, typically inside the plant, help reducing the grid harmonic distortion as they represent parallel paths for the harmonic currents. Ignoring or neglecting those loads lead to pessimistic results.
  • Full load does not mean rated transformer power: A typical worst case considers the drive (VFD) running at full load. However, full load does not mean full power on the input transformer. First of all, there are design margins: electric motor is some 10…15% oversized compared to the driven load. The VFD may have additional margin on top of the VFD rating. And input transformer has some margin to consider the undervoltage.
  • Positive, negative and zero sequence impedance: The VFD generates harmonics that can be positive, negative or zero sequence. To get correct results, the user shall enter corresponding positive, negative and zero sequence impedance. Often, only positive sequence impedance is known.
  • Overall philosophy from optimistic, over realistic and conservative to ultra-conservative approach. Some conservatism can be justified and even recommended. However, combining multiple “worst case” factors will result in totally unrealistic scenario.

Only some factors were mentioned in this blog post. The real list is longer and many of those factors can dramatically change the results from “fully compliant” to “mitigation measures needed” or vice versa.

Do you want to know more? Purchase our premium subscription!

References

[1] Harmonic calculation versus network harmonic study, MB Drive Services, January 2021, available online, https://mb-drive-services.com/harmonic-calculation-versus-network-harmonic-study/

[2] What does purely inductive network actually mean? MB Drive Services, July 2021, available online, https://mb-drive-services.com/what-does-purely-inductive-network-actually-mean/

[3] How do system parameters impact the grid harmonic distortion? MB Drive Services, November 2023, available online, https://mb-drive-services.com/how-do-system-parameters-impact-the-grid-harmonic-distortion/


0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *